I recently came across Remnant MD, a Renaissance doctor/blogger whose tagline is “Unifying ancestral medical wisdom with modern physiology.” He began sharing his insights in 2021 after circumstances in 2020 surrounding COVID tipped him over the edge.
I feature his article Inject the Pregnant, because: 1) it is too good not to share, 2) he writes with wisdom, and 3) pregnant women must appreciate their role and responsibility for carrying the next generation.
In his September 2022 article, Remnant MD writes:
Mothers were forced into either:
1. Taking an experimental drug – even if you deny the existence of harm, or
2. Complete ostracization. No livelihood, no entrance to indoor spaces in NYC.Whoever did this hates our mothers. – Remnant MD
Since 2021, prospects for a safe pregnancy have declined.
Where once upon a time, the precautionary principle cautioned against adding anything synthetic to a pregnant woman’s birth plan or body, today, ‘pregnant persons’ are considered no different from anyone else, so vaccines are ‘suitable and necessary.’
The pandemic changed everything. While pregnant women were excluded from the COVID EUA vaccine ‘safety trials,’ they were told to get the jab. By 2021, academicians declared that the exclusion of pregnant and lactating women in experimental vaccine trials is “a missed opportunity.”
The stated medical reasons for ‘injecting the pregnant’ are to improve: 1) maternal health, 2) pregnancy, 3) birth outcomes, and 4) avoid the delay of developing treatment recommendations for pregnant women.
Do infants need to be protected from something that has virtually no significant impact on their health? Assuming these are relatively healthy infants. –Remnant MD
Why would pregnant women need to be treated for pregnancy?
Today, pregnancy is no longer a natural process between a man and a women, but a medicalized procedure, requiring a hospital staff and medical insurance. Becoming a patient means your body, and the one you carry, are not your own. They belong to the system.
Today, ‘pregnant people’ do not require the female gender. And according to a Texas fifth circuit court decision, pregnant women do not have a right to access medical care in medical emergencies.
Perhaps that is why 2021 saw home births in the U.S. rise to its highest level in 30 years. According to one report, U.S. home births rose 19% in 2020 as the pandemic hit.
However, the transition away from medicalized birthing has not affected the fertility rate, which continues to plummet. According to the health and tech world, falling fertility is cause to celebrate.
Falling Fertility Rates
In an August 2021 article in Think Magazine, health and technology, the headline read, “America’s fertility rates are falling. That’s cause for celebration, not fearmongering.”
Women used to be warned about a ticking clock, that after age 35, fertility falls off a cliff. And sperm quality and fertility decline for men around age 45. Of course, there are always exceptions, including a healthy body and mind. The biology of female fertility used to go something like this:
A baby girl is born with about one million eggs in her tiny ovaries, but by the time she reaches puberty there are only about 300,000 eggs left. Of the eggs that remain when a woman starts having periods, only 300-400 will mature and be released in ovulation during the reproductive years. By the time a woman reaches menopause, there are no more functioning eggs in her ovaries.
The focus in no longer on eggs, sperm, and healthy children. Several sources report the total fertility rate in the U.S. — the number of births that a woman is expected to have over her lifetime –was at 1.73, an all-time low in 2020. Today, the number of births are the lowest since 1979. Is this cause for humanity to celebrate?
The negative impact of the pandemic is blamed as the main cause for recent low fertility rates for age—30- to 34-year-olds. Experts blame COVID-recession. But could there be other reasons, not disclosed by experts?
The COVID Factor
In a 2022 paper titled, Patient Betrayal, Dr. James A. Thorpe, MD, pointed to the medical community and accused them of hypocrisy: See the video here.
There is currently no scientific data to support the use of mRNA gene therapy treatment during pregnancy. None. The long-term outcomes are unknown… Despite significant signs of danger about the safety and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines, governing bodies of healthcare professionals have banded together in cartel-like fashion, issuing threats to destroy the livelihood of physicians and other health care providers for alleged dissemination of “misinformation” about COVID-19. – James A. Thorpe, MD, Ob/Gyn & Maternal Fetal Medicine
The Remnant MD writes, “Those of us who held the view that infants were being exposed to Spike protein mRNA in breastmilk, were laughed at. Now, the Journal of the American Medical Association confirmed it.”
There is no question that pregnant or nursing mothers, who accept an mRNA injection, deliver toxins in lipid nanoparticles through their bodies, and into their developing fetuses and nursing infants. The contents of mRNA injections do not stay in your arm, not that any vaccine ever did. The point if for the vaccine to reach the lymph nodes. It’s called ‘The Bodyhack – bringing mRNA to the right cells at the right places.’
The whole purpose of lipid nanoparticles is that they cross boundaries. … Eventually getting to the heart, causing myocarditis. Or to the brain, causing encephalitis. And there is no reason to think it could not get to glandular tissue. Like mammary glands. Breasts. Which make Milk. -Remnant MD
Knowing that mRNA injections cause harm to anyone taking them, why inject pregnant women?
Transhumanism
The stork is going out of business.
Transhumanism seeks to control the biology of humanity. Who needs biology when there are brain microchips, neural lace to mind-controlled prosthesis, and IVF technology to select embryos?
According to Forbes Magazine, by 2030, the future of humanity will not only continue using CRISPR gene-editing technology to modify the genome, but also add “subdermal RFID chips that allow users to unlock doors or computer passwords with the wave of a hand.” This is just the beginning.
The merging of man and machine will not require the use of female bodies, eggs, or sperm, for procreation. The future of humanity is a post-human world. What is posthuman?
Posthumans could be completely synthetic artificial intelligences, or they could be enhanced uploads, or they could be the result of making many smaller but cumulatively profound augmentations to a biological human.
Some posthumans may find it advantageous to jettison their bodies altogether and live as information patterns on vast super-fast computer networks. Their minds may be not only more powerful than ours but may also employ different cognitive architectures or include new sensory modalities that enable greater participation in their virtual reality settings.
Posthumanism may accommodate transgender men to experience pregnancy before the ultimate ‘Bodyhack’ to prevent all people from conceiving, whatever their hormone status. When women stop having children because their bodies no longer function that way, the hope of the Transhumanist crowd is that people move into a vessel, or a computer network, like a crab finding a larger shell. This is the reason for Remnant MD’s statement:
Whoever did this hates our mothers. – Remnant MD
We live in the J. Edgar Electronic Global Predator State. “ https://www.azquotes.com/quote/837213 Remnant MD’s statement:
Whoever did this hates our mothers. – Remnant MD