The “Inseminated Person”

From newly proposed laws to major astrological changes, humanity is in for some challenging adjustments beginning in 2025.

In the Wisconsin legislature, a new 2025 democratic bill proposes to replace the term, “mother” with “inseminated person,” and “paternity” with “parentage.”

No, this is not the latest Monty Python film, but it is being called a parody. The WI governor is facing backlash for erasing mothers in the 2025 budget. Perhaps he wants to be remembered as the “IT” guy?

Unless you read the fine print in Wisconsin’s new Senate bill 45 “relating to state finances and appropriations, constituting the executive budget act of the 2025 legislature,” you might miss the changes at the end of the 2000-page document.

Fortunately, an article at Townhall.com highlighted the bill’s farcical language. Other changes include officially changing “husband” and “wife” to “person” and “spouse.”

In 2021, House speaker Pelosi, began the rule-making trend when new rules of gender-neutral language, were unveiled to “honor all gender identities by changing pronouns and familial relationships in the House Rules to be gender neutral.”

From the People’s House to your house, the rules go beyond reason. “Gendered Terms Banned Under New House Rules” means either avoid saying “mother” and “father,” or face the consequences.

These new laws are not the 2013 gender language changes of careers, when “firemen” and “policemen” changed to “firefighters” and “police officers.”

Gender Neutrality or Gender Deception?

According to the American Psychiatric Association, Gender dysphoria is the medical diagnosis for those with “significant distress” due to the difference between their gender and sex.

Gender neutrality is an international agenda that has been extensively debated in France, especially since President Macron made this issue the “great cause” of his 2017-2022 mandate.

In France, gender diplomacy is the “great national cause” of President Macron’s term and for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. But other countries are in harmony. For instance, New Zealand’s newly elected Prime Minister refused to define the term “woman.” Could the new gender language laws be related to a deception hidden below the belt?

There appears to be an agenda to blur the line between men and women to make room for the “IT” generation. After all, why bring gender neutrality into Foreign Affairs? It is like calling all countries ‘Switzerland.’

The changes have already created some pushback. In June 2024, two women went on trial in France for claiming the French first lady does not exist because ‘she’ is transgender. Later, the women were found guilty of slander, as the courts bypassed the question of gender.

So what if Brigitte Macron was born a biological male! More and more trans-politicians are announcing themselves to the world.

If Trans is not about “coming out” then it could be about deception. The main concern is what are the Macrons, and others, concealing (besides body parts)?

Should the people not have a right to know the true motives of public servants when it comes to laws that will impact everyone?

The Macron story did not end in 2024. According to Candace Owens, in her expose of “Becoming Brigitte” Mr. and Mr. Macron are manipulating journalists, the press, and court rooms because they are involved in child pornography/trafficking.

Just how many Politico-transgenders are incognito to hide a predilection for minors?

Gender Dilemmas

It should not matter whether a man or woman wants to change her/his biological sex. After all, changing gender is a personal choice and private matter. Anyone pursuing this lifestyle must also deal with the longterm health effects of hormone use, including cardiovascular risks; increased mortality risk that does not decrease over time; and infertility. After all, we are playing with hormones.

One problem of new gender pronoun laws involves making the world conform to someone’s gender proclivities. Suddenly males and females must learn a new language or else there are penalties. This presents serious First Amendment issues on both sides:

Does calling cisgender people—but not transgender people—by the name and pronouns that reflect the gender they know themselves to be, diminish the dignity of transgender people and create a double standard?

The goal of the Equality Act is to add sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity to the list of prohibited discriminations. Created in 1974, it lingers in Congress.

In some states, cisgender people are made to pay for the sex preferences of Trans people. For instance, in 2018, Wisconsin governor Evers offered insurance coverage to transgender state employees seeking hormone therapy and gender confirmation surgery.

Ironically, these laws center around “Gender Dysphoria,” a psychological condition diagnosed by a medically licensed professional. Why would Evers and his fellow democratic governors make this a central platform? Does he want to change “his” pronoun?

Astrologically Speaking

Whether you follow astrological transits or not, January 19-20, 2025, marked the transit of the largest dwarf planet, Pluto, into Aquarius. This coincided with inauguration day. What might this mean?

According to Astrologers, Aquarius is a sign that governs innovation, technology, nuclear, and revolutions. The last time Pluto transited Aquarius (in 1778-1798), the world experienced seismic shifts, from the American Revolution to the French Revolution and the early days of the Industrial Revolution. After 248 years traveling the zodiac to make its appearance on inauguration day, this transit brings a heightened interest in A.I. nuclear reactors, and electronics.

While I am no astrologer, I do appreciate a method of forecasting that humans have used for thousands of years. Since the 1st millennium BC, the Venus tablet of Ammisaduqa, tracked the motion of Venus. Of course, the ancient Egyptians contributed the idea that patterns of stars make up constellations, through which the sun ‘appears to move’ during the year (i.e., zodiac).

The Gender Inclusive Brave New World

Politicians market a gender-neutral narrative as “gender affirming,” “gender inclusive,” and even “protection of Transgender, Binary, Non-conforming.” At the same time, they remove the male and female, mother and father, from the equation, destroying both individual and family identity in one blow.

As we embark on a brave new world of A.I. where gender is “neutral,” and body parts sliced off, are we turning a blind eye to the natural form of the human being, whose internal cell structures remain the biologic original?

Cybernetics is the central theme of A.I. Cyborgs, whether robots or hybrids, do not have a gender. The cyborg is a-gender. Will rights be granted to the cyborgs or will they be transferred from humans to cyborgs?

Have we already begun the process of sublimating power of the individual to the Hive mind of A.I.?

Related articles: