Logic 101:
The transitive property of equality in mathematics tells us that if a=b, b=c, then it follows that a=c.
The transitive property of human nature tells us that while mathematics does not lie, mathematicians do.
Moral of the story? Prove your foundations FIRST and FOREMOST before engaging the conclusion.
Do not agree to “A = C” when B does not equal C.
In law, this is referred to as “fruit of the poisonous tree,” or illegally obtained evidence.
In politics, it is referred to as the Hegelian Dialectic: Problem, Reaction. Solution.
In justice, it is referred to as fraud.
Illegal Evidence Built Foundation For COVID
Let’s apply this principle to COVID/Coronavirus:
Where A = COVID comes from Coronavirus.
And B = Coronavirus is contagious and deadly.
And C = If COVID is deadly, then government must implement mask and vaccine mandates, enforce social distancing, take away the freedom to assemble, abolish parental rights, lockdown cities and countries, deploy military in the streets, limit customers to restaurants and other small businesses.
However, what if B cannot be proven because the virus named SARS-CoV-2 has not been isolated? Where is the foundation for deliberate world changes?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) says the virus is not available. The July 13, 2020 CDC document titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [For Emergency Use Only] section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” p. 39 reads:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA..
The CDC has no measurable amount of the virus, because Coronavirus is “unavailable.” The virus is not found.
Virus Never Isolated
If the CDC cannot produce a virus because it cannot isolate a virus, then it follows that the virus does not exist. If the virus does not exist, it cannot be tested. If there is no virus, and no valid test, then there is no reason for mandates and restrictions that remain illegal under the law.
A virus no-show.
The same logic holds true for HIV and Measles viruses.
Scientists are doing an awful lot of damage to the world in the name of helping it. I don’t mind attacking my own fraternity because I am ashamed of it. –Kary Mullis, Inventor of Polymerase Chain Reaction
Viruses: Not Living Organisms
Firstly, unlike a bacterium, which is a living organism, a virus requires a cell within a host animal to survive. Viruses cannot survive outside a cell. If a virus cannot function once outside a cell, then how can any virus be contagious? This suggests that all flus, at the cell level, are bacterial in nature, and the result of toxic exposures that are subsequently cleansed.
Secondly, Coronavirus fails to meet Koch’s postulates. For example, Coronavirus, like HIV, is in violation of Koch’s first postulate because it is not possible to detect free virus.
According to the book, The Age of Deception:
The entirety of virology and vaccine science is predicated on one thing—that viruses are infectious agents that cause disease.
Without this theory, vaccines would not be ‘effective’ or ‘work’ in the minds of the people.
Without the virus theory, vaccines would crumble like a house of cards.
This article will show the pseudoscience behind the theories that prop up virology and the vast problems with it.
A virus describes a cell’s exosome, which acts like an enzyme created inside a toxic cell in order to clean the cell from the inside out; a self-cleaning system. There are more than 4,400 articles published on exosomes.
What government suggests, recommends, and mandates for your cell’s creation of an exosome defies logic. Everyone in America can test positive for Covid-19 assuming they have an immune system with functioning cells.
But…but…what about the Canadian group that claimed to have isolated Coronavirus in March of 2020? Further, what about the October 2020 study in the journal Science which says a few researchers in a lab isolated the virus…?” China, Australia, and Italy also claim to have isolated the virus!
Scientists claimed that they “obtained a pure sample of the virus, which they have contained outside the human body and can then study.”
To cover all inconsistencies and contradictions, scientists also claim that: “viruses continuously mutate and evolve,” so “there are now several strains of the coronavirus, which are collectively known as Sars-CoV-2.”
However, viruses can only be observed in petri-dish, or artificial conditions (in vitro):
Cell cultures are grown in controlled conditions outside their natural environment, wherein cells are artificially kept alive by fluids that are toxic and do damage to cellular activity. In such a sterile environment, cells cannot utilize the full range of their normal cleansing methods as they would in the human body.
If the new narrative is “a collective virus,” are we talking about a “hive virus” that continues to evolve and allow only those scientists studying the virus under their high-powered microscopes to identify it? If only a few chosen scientists can identify a non-virus with a PCR test, a test deemed to be invalid for viruses by its inventor, then they must have a powerful, magical microscope.
But…but…what about the COVID death rates?
COVID Deaths Vs. Flu Deaths
Using CDC data, Bill Sardi, of LewRockwell.com, presented Total Deaths per month for the collective non-virus SARS-CoV2 for 2020 and compared them to previous years:
| TOTAL U.S. DEATHS (ALL CAUSES) | |||
| YEAR | TOTAL DEATHS U.S. | DEATHS/MONTH | REFERENCE |
| 2020 | 2,838,000* | 236,000 | CDC DATA CDC DATA |
| 2019 | 2,855,000 | 238,000 | CDC DATA |
| 2018 | 2,839,205 | 237,000 | CDC DATA |
| 2017 | 2,813,503 | 234,000 | CDC DATA |
| *Averaged for 12 months | |||
| Total Reported COVID-19 Coronavirus Deaths Oct. 1, 2020 207,008 (÷ 9 months = +23,000/month). Source: PatientCareOnline.com |
|||
| Origin: KnowledgeofHealth.com | |||
If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.2
