Where’s Waldo?
Three years after a virus called SARS-CoV2 was said to be the cause of COVID19, the virus has not been found. For a virus to be valid, it must be isolated. For that, a number of steps must be met, including what science calls Koch’s Postulates. To this day, the many published alleged “SARS-COV-2 genomes” were in fact manufactured, not discovered.
Yet, after continents have been shut down, economies and lives destroyed, illegal mandates invoked and revoked, and millions of people made to be inoculated with experimental “authorized” products, over 211 health science institutions, and 32 countries, cannot provide or even cite one proof of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.
Why has the majority of the world been duped? Have people trusted politicians who practice medicine without a license? Have governments that, until now, never agreed about anything, suddenly agree on a virus that does not exist? The question that still exists in the minds of many is this: The Virus: To Be or Not to Be?
In actuality, scientists have known that a virus does not exist as a life form outside a cell. Viruses function without sensory organs and without a means of locomotion. A virus is incapable of entering the cell membrane because a virus cannot detect it. In the 19th century, when Pasteur was promoting his theory, German biologist Dr. Rudolph Virchow stated:
If I could live my life over again, I would devote it to proving that germs seek their natural habitat—diseased tissue—rather than being the cause of the diseased tissue; e.g., mosquitoes seek the stagnant water, but do not cause the pool to become stagnant.
Antoine Béchamp (1816-1908) explained that “The characteristic microbe of a disease might be a symptom instead of a cause.” In his book, Mycrozymas, Béchamp laid the foundation for the concept of pleomorphism. Why bring up Béchamp now? Because this foremost pioneer of science, medicine, nutrition and genetics, along with his discoveries, could have saved humanity a whole lot of misery and suffering. It was “by design” that Louis Pasteur’s “Germ Theory of Disease was promoted; to build and profit a colossal pharmaceutical/medical empire.
Several people have attempted to prove that the Waldo of viruses, SARS-Co-2, is the causal agent for COVID-19. However, according to Canadian citizen, Christine Massey, a former statistician who has compiled a paper trail of official responses, the virus is an imposter. It simply does not exist. See an interview with Christine here. Her main conclusions can be found at this website and are excerpted here:
- There is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” (blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures) actually exists.”
- “In their responses, numerous institutions have made it explicitly clear that isolation/purification is simply never done in virology, and that “isolation” in virology means the exact opposite of what it means in everyday English. This is also evidenced in every “virus isolation” paper we have ever seen, for any alleged “virus”.
Ruh-roh! Isolation of viruses is not done by virologists?
See Christine Massey’s collection of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) responses grouped by country:
As of September 11, 2022: 211 institutions and offices in over 35 countries have responded thus far, as well as some “SARS-COV-2 isolation” study authors, and none have provided or cited any record describing actual “SARS-COV-2” isolation/purification.
Response from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
A search of our records fail to reveal any documents pertaining to your request.
Response from Health Canada:
Response from Philippines, Portugal, Romania, Taiwan:
The realtime RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, does not “isolate” the virus but rather detects short target sequences of the virus in clinical samples. If these target sequences are detected in clinical samples, these can be amplified and detected through the test.
Response from Public Health Wales:
…. has not produced any of the above mentioned material.
Response from the UK:
I confirm that we do not hold this information.
On and on, no one has validation of the cause of a global pandemic? In cases where officials claim to I.D. SARS-Cov-2, they point to modeling studies and gene sequencing (See the NIH GenBank Website), all of which are tied to patents.
Fake “Isolates” Used in Vaccine Development
Several research teams claimed isolation of the virus, which they call versions of a virus. Can versions be an original? Researchers at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre (VIDO-InterVac) at the University of Saskatchewan tried to claim, early in 2020, to have isolated a version of the virus. See the March 202o Press Release:
On Friday, Paul Hodgson, associate director of business development at the Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre in Saskatoon, confirmed to The Globe and Mail that the joint federal-provincial facility had quietly reached the same milestone a few weeks earlier and is now using its version of the virus for a vaccine development effort.
Samples of the Saskatoon-derived version of the coronavirus are now available for approved research groups through the National Microbiological Laboratory in Winnipeg. The Ontario group also plans to generate its version for distribution.
In reality, viruses are exosomes. In the paper titled, Is Complete Purification/Isolation of a “Virus” Even Possible? The medical literature summarizes the challenges of purification and isolation:
- In order to claim a particular particle is a “virus” and can cause the symptoms of disease associated with it, logic dictates that it must be completely separated from all other potential variables/factors in order to prove that particular particle is indeed the cause of disease. This is the only logical way to show that no other particles in the sample could have been the cause of disease and in the case of genomics, that the DNA/RNA sequences belongs to only that particular particle which is believed to be a “virus.”
- Viruses” are considered exosomes in every sense of the word as they are identical in size, shape, and appearance.
- Exosome isolation remains a challenge for biomedical research. There is still no consensus over which purification technique produces the best results.
- There is no methodology providing enough robustness regarding purification yield, selectivity, and reproducibility.
- Contamination from other vesicles, molecules or particles that overlap is expected.
- The main difference is that exosome research regularly attempts purification using one or multiple methods whereas Virology does not…. the methods discussed all suffer from contamination from other particles.
An Abstract written by Drs Mark Bailey and John Bevan Smith demonstrates what a growing number of people have discovered for themselves: If SARS-CoV-2 is a fraud, then COVID-19 is a fraud.
In The case of the Missing Virus, the curtain has been pulled back to reveal the great deception of the foundation of medical science. Is Virology a science or a hoax? Are Virologists making claims without the ability to draw conclusions or provide proof?
Again, the CDC states the virus is not available. The July 13, 2020 CDC document titled, “CDC 2019-Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel” [For Emergency Use Only] section titled, “Performance Characteristics,” p. 39 reads:
Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays [diagnostic tests] designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA.
The germs are laughing.
It’s time to call out medical science for its false narratives and shaky foundations. Why not make world governments prove the basis for injections? Because it is impossible to prove the virus. After all these years, The Germ Theory appears to be a dud and virologists everywhere are having the last laugh as long as people believe in them.
Related Past Articles:
- The CoroNOvirus Reality
- To Question the Nature of Reality
- Mixed Messages: COMIRNATY or. CRIMINALITY?
- Prophets Roll Out The New Freedom
- Coronovirus Deception: Defying Logic
- The Virus: To be or Not to be?
- Say Goodbye to the Germ Theory
- Questioning the Terrain Theory
- Status of COVID19: Plandemic
- Breakthrough Immunity
- Redefining Herd Immunity
“No” virus makes no sense. Here is a comment and analysis by arguably THE best PhD biologist in the field, a major force of nature: https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1683585529
His website and historical and scientific references are here https://gigaohmbiological.com/ He is worth an interview.
There IS a virus: we know withing 2 Angstrom precision the shape and components of the spike [cryo electron microscopy] and hundreds of thousands of genome sequences. You cannot image and sequence a genome if it does not exist.
Personal proof, my lady friend felt bad, tested positive and then negative on an antigen test [that excludes the common other coronas et al] and then myself, still positive .. Trust me, I feel it, again. Best wishes, Eddie Vos
Thank you for writing. I am not here to convince anyone of anything. You can believe what you like. My proofs are based in science (with links). Who you consider “THE best PhD Biologist” is your opinion. Does your biologist understand Exosomes? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=exosomes1.
The CDC’s standing document on COVID says there is no evidence of any virus. [Source 1].
2. A virus is so small that it cannot be distinguished from a variety of contaminants. Further, the concept of “a virus” is that it cannot penetrate a cell membrane because it is not alive. A virus must already be within a host cell because it has to make use of the machinery in the hosts’ cells to function. This is called an “exosome.” In other words, you cannot “catch” or pass along a “virus” from person to person. It is, however, highly likely that many people in an area who are exposed to the same poisons or toxins will all react in a similar way.
3. Viruses are exosomes. Exosomes are created within a cell that is toxic (to clean itself). Purification of a “virus” is not possible. [Source 2]
4. Unfortunately, you cannot base a positive or negative ID of any virus on a PCR test.
5. The inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, a Chemist, Biochemist, and Nobel Laureate, warned against its use for any virus. [Source 3]
6. The CDC withdrew the original PCR test as a valid test since it could not distinguish between covid and the flu [Source 4]
Dr Mullis said that this PCR test was not made to detect any type of infectious disease. He said this about HIV, which is the same story retold for COVID [HIV causes AIDS]. There is no proof that HIV virus causes AIDS. They created a patented product [DNA sequences] in a lab. [Source 5]. That is how only they know the sequences.
7. All viruses must be proven by Koch’s Postulates, says the science. This virus is not proven by Koch’s postulates. Neither was HIV. This calls into question others well-known diseases like measles, zika, ebola. Are they real?
8. The CDC also talks about Exposomes, different from exosomes. They recognize that disease is based on exposures and that everyone can respond differently. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/exposome/default.html
9. Reread the evidence presented in this article and put your thinking cap on.
Best regards to you.
Source 1 https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download [see page 39].
Source 2 https://viroliegy.com/2021/09/20/is-complete-purification-isolation-of-a-virus-even-possible/
Source 3 https://odysee.com/@Dryburgh:7/kary-mullis-pcr-anthony-fauci:b?r=FK4LfE3kq2QAbgu76DE67BEpPTacGNmm&sunset=lbrytv
Source 4 https://www.cdc.gov/locs/2021/07-21-2021-lab-alert-Changes_CDC_RT-PCR_SARS-CoV-2_Testing_1.html
Source 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vuxibKj4z8
Thank You Rosanne you articles are always inspiring. – Dr. David Martin, July 9, 2021. Irrefutable Evidence, Video Testimony “there is no virus” & Fauci Dossier. 1999 to present, patents CDC… https://totalityofevidence.com/dr-david-martin/ file:///var/mobile/Library/SMS/Attachments/12/02/9C7A952D-FCE7-48F3-B005-105B3F263320/The_Fauci_COVID-19_Dossier.pdf